Difference between Manual Testing and Automation Testing
Software testing is widely categorized into manual testing and automation testing. While both are very dynamic and crucial to the entire process in their ways, there are several notable differences between these two testing methods.
Manual testing refers to the evaluation of software applications manually without any written code. Software testers develop testing strategies and apply their QA skills to identify defects/flaws in software.
Automation testing is the process of evaluating software applications by running automated tests. Here, testers write codes to automate test cases that need to be executed repeatedly. Test automation can avoid time-consuming and repetitive tasks.
We, at Sapizon Technologies, are a pioneer in both manual and automation testing. By executing brilliant testing strategies accurately, we have achieved great success in helping our clients deliver flawless software applications.
Our team of software testers is vastly experienced operating under a result-oriented approach. Having completed several successful projects, we have established ourselves as one of the best software testing companies in the USA.
Key differences between Manual and Automation Testing:
Here are some of the major differences between manual testing and automation testing:
Testing Time:
Manual testing takes longer to execute because the testers check every feature of an application related to proper functioning and UI. Automation testing is an accelerated process where test cases are automated through written code.
User Interface:
In manual testing, testers check the UI of the application in a phased and detailed manner. In automation testing, UI is not emphasized as much because the testers as actively involved in the execution as they are in manual testing.
Accuracy:
While manual testing has a larger scope for human error even if it is executed multiple times, automation testing derives very accurate results as the involvement of testing tools is more.
Reliability:
Automation testing is more reliable compared to manual testing because manual testing is more dependent on human knowledge, skills, and execution which is not flawless all the time.
Programming:
Manual testing requires no programming or coding efforts as everything is handled by the testers manually. Automation testing requires coding and programming to automate selected test cases.
Test Cases for Manual and Automation Testing:
Here is a brief explanation of how manual and automation testing are executed in diverse test cases:
Ad-hoc Testing:
Ad-hoc testing requires no fixed methods or approaches. It is dependent on the understanding and knowledge of the testers. This type of testing requires the tester to have intricate knowledge of the software under test.
Since there is no fixed approach involved, manual testing is well suited for it.
Usability Testing:
Usability Testing is concerned with making the application user-friendly to deliver the best customer experience. This practice of testing involves the testers acting as end-users to evaluate the usability of the application.
Therefore, manual testing is more suited to usability testing.
Regression Testing:
Regression testing is carried out to check if previously developed software is still fully operational after feature updates are made to it. Since it requires frequent execution, automation testing is more suited to it compared to manual testing.
Load Testing:
Load testing is conducted to check the behavior of the software in normal and peak conditions. Manual testing may not give accurate results of the load that is being sustained. Hence, automation testing is recommended for load testing.
Both manual and automation testing play a crucial role in the software testing process. Both the testing types are instrumental in the shaping of a defect-free software application.
About Us
Founded in 2015, Sapizon Technologies is one of the top software testing companies in the USA. We started with an objective to help our clients improve their businesses through our efficient services.
We possess an experienced team of software testers who develop robust testing strategies and implement them in a phased manner as per the project demand.
Driven by transparency and flexibility, we have completed more than 100 projects successfully. We render our services across different industry verticals and strive to achieve client satisfaction.
Comments