Performance is the key to great user experience and top engineering organizations among other companies that consider performance as an important feature of their most critical applications. In addition, increasing competition in the digital space and continuous increase to the top paved the way to focus on performance in design and architecture in addition to broader image techniques. Therefore, slow loading or non-responsive web pages have an impact on financial income because of frustrated users.
Also Read: manual Testing Company in New York
Although an unbroken and unlimited experience is the result of a perfect performance testing scenario, traditional methods do not give you a holistic view of your user experience, so that it paves the way for a gap that affects the performance of your application. In fact, the more time you devote to performance testing, the better the software or application capabilities to handle unprecedented loads in each uncompromising situation. This means that the company must take into account the effective performance testing strategy to highlight performance problems by following the industrial specified protocol to ensure the application behaves in a certain way.
Also Read: manual Testing Company in Boston
What is the protocol-based performance test?
This testing methodology involves simulation of virtual users by producing a high level of demand at the level of protocols and performance measured based on demand-response behavior. For websites, client-side metrics such as response times, throughput, errors, etc. Measured during peak periods.
Also Read: manual Testing Company in Bay Area
Protocol-based performance testing benefits:
Easy settings and use
The ability to produce high volume of virtual users with minimum resources
Availability to use third-party tools to carry out protocol-based testing
Protocol-based performance testing is considered one of the earliest ways to test performance. His capacity to provide fast insight is one reason the company chooses this approach. However, with modern technology that is used as a foundation for websites, software and applications, important aspects of user experience and neglected currents.
Also Read: manual Testing Company in San Francisco
Performance testing tools such as JMETER usually capture HTTP / S data traffic as the client-server interaction through programming scripts. This involves a lot of manual workers as testers must develop scripts for various components. This requires additional efforts to decode the application performance as a result of the script does not take into account time to process the response between the server and end user interaction.
Also Read: manual Testing Company in USA
Weaknesses of protocol-based performance testing:
Simulate only network traffic and ignore modern web technology consisting of several client side scripts
There is no end to end testing. The reported response time does not include a browser-based response time contribution
Performance varies between different browsers
Kommentare